🎉 Hey Gate Square friends! Non-stop perks and endless excitement—our hottest posting reward events are ongoing now! The more you post, the more you win. Don’t miss your exclusive goodies! 🚀
🆘 #Gate 2025 Semi-Year Community Gala# | Square Content Creator TOP 10
Only 1 day left! Your favorite creator is one vote away from TOP 10. Interact on Square to earn Votes—boost them and enter the prize draw. Prizes: iPhone 16 Pro Max, Golden Bull sculpture, Futures Vouchers!
Details 👉 https://www.gate.com/activities/community-vote
1️⃣ #Show My Alpha Points# | Share your Alpha points & gains
Post your
In the Web3 space, we often overlook an important fact: the operational logic of blockchain smart contracts fundamentally differs from human thought processes. This difference is not only reflected at the technical level but also profoundly affects our understanding and evaluation of blockchain projects.
One of the core characteristics of Blockchain is its immutability. In contrast, humans are easily influenced by various external factors, including temptations of interest. This fundamental difference directly affects our judgment of the project's security.
For example, when we talk about liquidity locking, human thinking might assume that there is still a risk of being removed or abused even when liquidity is 100% locked, burned, and ownership is abandoned. However, from the perspective of smart contracts, once these conditions are met, liquidity cannot be removed or used for fraudulent activities.
This raises a key question: how do project developers truly demonstrate their sincerity? Relying solely on smart contracts audits is far from enough. In fact, relinquishing ownership and locking liquidity should become the standard practice in project development, as this better reflects the developers' good intentions than simply relying on smart contracts audits.
It is worth noting that while smart contracts audits have their value, they should not be seen as the sole indicator of a project's credibility. For inexperienced investors, over-relying on audit results may be misleading.
Therefore, we recommend that Web3 participants should develop the habit of directly verifying smart contracts and their functions on official Blockchain explorers (such as BscScan). Other tools can serve as auxiliary references, but should not be fully relied upon.
Overall, understanding and recognizing the fundamental differences between blockchain smart contracts and human logical thinking is crucial for appropriately evaluating and participating in Web3 projects. This not only helps investors make more informed decisions, but also promotes the entire industry towards a more transparent and reliable direction.